Apr 15
Teen beatings, kids who kill and teen violence in the news. What’s wrong with kids today?

It seems that the news is filled with it. Columbine, School Killers, Playground Beatings and Third Grade Murder Plots… Teens beating a girl to post a video on YouTube, Sport Killings of the Homeless, and other kids who kill.
Some people think that there’s no increase, but that we have more access to news so we hear more of it.
Not true.
From 1986-1995, Juvenile arrests for murder and nonnegligent manslaughter increased 90%
From 1991-1995, female juvenile arrests for Violent Crime Index offenses increased 34%
http://www.violentkids.com/violence_facts.html
Wouldn’t you just love to see 1995-2008 numbers? I’m sure it’s horrifying. But… why?
Is it bad parenting skills?
…For the past 25 years, psychologist Gerald R. Patterson of the Oregon Social Learning Center in Eugene and his colleagues have noticed that some parents and children bring out the worst in each other. Their daily interactions consist of the parents demanding compliance with some rule or request, the child refusing to comply, and the parents eventually giving in. Long-term studies indicate that these coercive interactions foster aggression…
http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20060527/bob8.asp
The country attorney’s office of Hennepin County, Minnesota, analyzed the records of 135 children, ages 4 to 9, who had been accused of crimes. They found that 91% lived in families receiving AFDC, 81% were in families that had been investigated by child protective services, 70% had at least one parent or sibling who had been in trouble with the law…
http://www.casanet.org/Library/juvenile-justice/violentkids.htm
Is it something more insidious?
Like, corporate profit? The American Academy of Pediatrics says that media violence can contribute to aggressive behavior and desensitization to violence.
…children between the ages of 2 and 18 years spend an average of six hours and 32 minutes each day using media, which includes television, commercial or self-recorded video, movies, video games, print, radio, recorded music, computer and the Internet. In fact, they spend more time using media than any other activity, with the exception of sleeping…
Have you ever heard of Killology?
Is that a cop out? Blame the media and we’re not responsible? I’m not so sure. There’s some really eye opening information at the Killology Research Website. Like this, for example…
I spent almost a quarter of a century as an Army infantry officer, a paratrooper, a Ranger, and a West Point Psychology Professor, learning and studying how we enable people to kill. Most soldiers have to be trained to kill.
Healthy members of most species have a powerful, natural resistance to killing their own kind. Animals with antlers and horns fight one another by butting heads. Against other species they go to the side to gut and gore. Piranha turn their fangs on everything, but they fight one another with flicks of the tail. Rattlesnakes bite anything, but they wrestle one another.
During World War II, we discovered that only 15-20 percent of the individual riflemen would fire at an exposed enemy soldier (Marshall, 1978)… Only a small percentage of soldiers are willing and able to kill. When the military became aware of this, they systematically went about the process of “fixing” this “problem.” And fix it they did. By Vietnam the firing rate rose to over 90 percent (Grossman, 1999a)…
The training methods the military uses are brutalization, classical conditioning, operant conditioning, and role modeling. Let us explain these and then observe how the media does the same thing to our children… (snipped for length).
… something very similar is happening to our children through violence in the media. It begins at the age of 18 months, when a child can begin to understand and mimic what is on television. But up until they’re six or seven years old they are developmentally, psychologically, physically unable to discern the difference between fantasy and reality. Thus, when a young child sees somebody on TV being shot, stabbed, raped, brutalized, degraded, or murdered, to them it is real, and some of them embrace violence and accept it as a normal and essential survival skill …
On June 10th, 1992, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) published a definitive study on the impact of TV violence. In nations, regions, or cities where television appears there is an immediate explosion of violence on the playground, and within 15 years there is a doubling of the murder rate. Why 15 years? That’s how long it takes for a brutalized toddler to reach the “prime crime” years. That’s how long it takes before you begin to reap what you sow when you traumatize and desensitize children. (Centerwall, 1992).
The JAMA concluded that, “the introduction of television in the 1950’s caused a subsequent doubling of the homicide rate, i.e., long-term childhood exposure to television is a causal factor behind approximately one half of the homicides committed in the United States, or approximately 10,000 homicides annually.” The study went on to state that “…if, hypothetically, television technology had never been developed, there would today be 10,000 fewer homicides each year in the United states, 70,000 fewer rapes, and 700,000 fewer injurious assaults”
That’s just an excerpt of a longer article called “Teaching Kids to Kill” and it provides plenty of research, data and statistics to back up it’s claims. It talks about conditioning. And it’s eye opening.
Here’s another excellent snippet…
Classical conditioning is like Pavlov’s dog in Psych 101. Remember the ringing bell, the food, and the dog could not hear the bell without salivating?
In World War II, the Japanese would make some of their young, unblooded soldiers bayonet innocent prisoners to death. Their friends would cheer them on. Afterwards, all these soldiers were treated to the best meal they’ve had in months, sake, and to so-called “comfort girls.” The result? They learned to associate violence with pleasure.
This technique is so morally reprehensible that there are very few examples of it in modern U.S. military training, but the media is doing it to our children. Kids watch vivid images of human death and suffering and they learn to associate it with: laughter, cheers, popcorn, soda, and their girlfriend’s perfume…
What do you think? Why are our kids more violent today?
a) Bad parenting
b) Violence on tv
c) Violence in the movies
d) Violence in music (ie; lyrics)
e) Violent video games
f) Violence in the home
g) All of the above
h) None of the above
i) Other (such as?)
j) Still don’t believe they are worse…
Popularity: 36% [?]

























j
it took me a minute, drew.
To quote from the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics website, “Since 1994, violent crime rates have declined, reaching the lowest level ever in 2005.” and, “The proportion of serious violent crimes committed by juveniles has generally declined since 1993.” Also, according to the chart here at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/glance/vage.htm shows that youth of today are the least violent since at least 1973.
Hey Drew… thanks for that link. What I find confusing is that the “statistics” vary depending where you read them. Like these…
Crimes reported to police declined slightly for the third year in a row during 1994, led by an eight percent drop in violent crime in cities with more than a million residents. FBI Uniform Crime Reports, 1994. However, arrests of youths under eighteen years of age for violent crimes surged by seven percent. Id. The number of teenagers under eighteen arrested for murder has risen over one hundred fifty percent from 1985 to 1994.
http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm00102.htm
While the number of delinquency cases rose 43 percent from 1985 to 2000, the increases varied by offense. Violent sex offenses, other than forcible rape, increased by 160 percent. Weapons violations increased 175 percent. Liquor law violations rose 103 percent, and nonviolent sex offenses were up 94 percent.
http://www.libraryindex.com/pages/459/Juvenile-Crime-CRIMES-COURT-STATISTICS.html
The stats that vary place to place can be confusing — makes a person wonder what the heck to believe.
I also wonder, when teens are tried as adults, is that recorded under juvenile crime, or does it go in adult crime stats?
I haven’t found the answer to that one, either. Thoughts?
The problem with any of these assumptions is that they are based on statistics and statistics very rarely tell the truth and are almost always flawed in their assumptions.
For example you quoted -
This doesn’t tell me that the numbers of the crimes in questions increased. It’s telling me that the police have become more efficient at apprehending the accused. It also doesn’t tell me what percentage of arrested people were guilty. Just that people were arrested.
Does it take into account the increased willingness of people to come forward when they are the victims or certain crime types.
People have always been and will always be people. There has always been crime, rape, murder, rage violence. It’s nothing new.
It’s just now it’s reported exponentially more, and as the population numbers increase rapidly so will the number of potential criminals and the volume of reporting.
I would willingly wager that the over all percentages of criminal activity have changed very little in the western world in recorded history with respect t population numbers. However detection has come on leaps and bounds and reporting has come so far as to sensationalize every little thing.
I’m trying hard to remember the last “nice thing” reported on the news that wasn’t being sensationalized.
Bad parenting does factor into to the problem, but there have always been bad parents, there will always be.
But you must ask, what is bad parenting? Outside of extremes of violence and abuse it’s hard to determine and to get people to agree on (yeah drink and drugs..) but you know what I mean.
Tessy…
Many blogs have stopped using trackbacks because dealing with spam became too burdensome. This enables authors to keep track of who…